Follow us:
POSTED BY Buzz ON Mar 21, 2014 AT 19:26 IST ,  Edited At: Mar 21, 2014 19:26 IST

Click for bigger picture

Two articles based on interviews with Mehmood Pracha, the lawyer who is defending German Bakery bombing convict Himayat Baig, have resulted in the US-based website receiving the above summons from Mumbai police’s Cyber Crime Cell.

Read Full Post  |  14 comments
POSTED BY Buzz ON Mar 21, 2014 AT 19:26 IST, Edited At: Mar 21, 2014 19:26 IST
POSTED BY News Ed ON Mar 05, 2014 AT 00:57 IST ,  Edited At: Mar 04, 2014 23:57 IST


When news first broke of Shiksha Bachao Andolan Samiti (SBAS) also targeting Wendy Doniger's On Hinduism published by the Aleph Book Company, after its success with  getting Penguin Books India to withdraw her The Hindus: An Alternative History, Atul Kothari, co-convenor of SBAS, was quoted by The Sunday Express as saying, “We have been given an oral assurance by the publishers that the sales of the book will be stalled. The publishers have been given a week’s time to provide an assurance in writing, failing which, SBAS would move the judiciary.”  He had said that they would wait for a written assurance for a week, failing which the Samiti may take its next “democratic step” to ensure the book is withdrawn.

Read Full Post  |  77 comments
POSTED BY News Ed ON Mar 05, 2014 AT 00:57 IST, Edited At: Mar 04, 2014 23:57 IST
POSTED BY Buzz ON Feb 27, 2014 AT 23:40 IST ,  Edited At: Feb 27, 2014 23:40 IST

Way back in 2012, Salman Rushdie had called it a "piece of garbage", President Obama had appealed for its removal, his administration initially blaming it for the deadly September 2012 protests at the American embassy in Benghazi, Libya that resulted in the killing of the US Ambassador to Libya, but YouTube had refused to take off the Innocence of Muslims, a purported documentary on Prophet Mohammed's life, citing USA's freespeech provisions.

Read Full Post  |  3 comments
POSTED BY Buzz ON Feb 27, 2014 AT 23:40 IST, Edited At: Feb 27, 2014 23:40 IST
POSTED BY Buzz ON Feb 11, 2014 AT 18:11 IST ,  Edited At: Feb 11, 2014 18:11 IST

For those who came in late:

Today's Developments

The legal notice sent by Dina Nath Batra to Wendy Doniger, Penguin Group (USA) Inc. and Penguin Books India Pvt. Ltd:

Read from Outlook archives:

This is not a case of a ban, or censorship or overt or covert governmental or judicial censorship, this is a case instead of moral policing and an abject surrender by Penguin India, in abdication of their responsibility to stand by their author and fight the legal battle.

Read Full Post  |  13 comments
POSTED BY Buzz ON Feb 11, 2014 AT 18:11 IST, Edited At: Feb 11, 2014 18:11 IST
POSTED BY Buzz ON Oct 31, 2013 AT 23:39 IST ,  Edited At: Oct 31, 2013 23:39 IST

Shailaja Bajpai in the Indian Express: The Chosen One

If the election results were to be decided solely by TV coverage, Modi would have won a landslide already.

Countries such as the US try to follow the idea of equal coverage especially in the run-up to an election — and especially after a politician is declared as the official candidate, as Modi has been. Recently, the Republicans threatened that TV channels, NBC and CNN, would not be allowed to telecast the party's next presidential debates because NBC had planned a TV series and CNN a documentary about Democrat Hillary Clinton. Indian news channels don't let minor matters like equality trouble them. They're obsessed with the man, to the point that Modi-fixation has become a clinical condition which may soon require treatment.

Read the full piece at the Indian Express: The Chosen One

While a debate on the idea of equal coverage is thus afoot, the Information and Broadcasting ministry on its own part is not-so-subtly using crude arm-twisting tactics, as this report in Niti Central, which put up the following ridiculous "advisory" issued by the I&B ministry, reveals, as an example of the ruling dispensation's desperate attempts to intimidate private TV channels:

No. 804/1 56/201 3-BC-lll

Dated 21st October, 2013


Whereas it had come to the notice of Ministry of Information & Broadcasting that certain TV channels attempted to denigrate the Office of the Prime Minister of India by constantly trying to compare the speech of the Hon’ble Prime Minister of India with the speech of other political leaders on 15th August, 2013.

Whereas the telecast of this kind of programme on a day when entire nation was celebrating its 67th Independence Day is highly objectionable. The Prime Minister spoke from the Ramparts of the Red Fort, as the Prime Minister of the country and not as a leader of a political party. Therefore, on such a solemn day to put him in an artificial competition with anyone is not appropriate. On Independence Day when the Prime Minister addresses the nation and the country is united in the emotions of national integrity, patriotism and national fervor, the attempt by certain TV channels to denigrate the status of the Prime Minister can best be described as sensational and against all norms of ethical journalism.

Whereas, as per Section 5 of the Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995 read with Rule 6 (1 X) & (i) of the Cable Television Networks Rules, 1994, as amended from time to time, no programme can be transmitted/retransmitted on any Cable Service which contains anything offensive against good taste or decency; and criticises, maligns or slanders any individual in person or certain groups, segments of social, public and moral life of the country.

Whereas, according to the basic conditions/obligations of permission/approval for Uplinking/Downlinking of TV Channels in India, the channels are bound to follow the Programme Code and Advertising Code as prescribed under the Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995 and rules framed thereunder.

Therefore, the Ministry of Information & Broadcasting, in exercise of powers under Uplinking/Downlinking Guidelines issued by it, the terms of permission granted to the Channel to uplink/downlink TV Channels and under Section 20 of the Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995, hereby advises all News & Current Affairs TV Channels to follow the provisions of the Programme and Advertising Codes scrupulously and keep the significance of the solemn days like Independence Day, etc. in view while carrying the speech of the Prime Minister and the President of India.

It is also brought to the notice of all TV channels that any further violation of the provisions of the Programme/Advertising Code would attract penal provisions stipulated in Section 20 of the Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995and the terms and conditions of uplinking and downlinking guidelines.

Director (DAS)
Te1 23381246

Read Full Post  |  43 comments
POSTED BY Buzz ON Oct 31, 2013 AT 23:39 IST, Edited At: Oct 31, 2013 23:39 IST
Short Takes
recent tags
Lok Sabha Elections
Opinion Polls
Poll Predictions
Priyanka Gandhi Vadra
A. Sanzgiri
Boria Majumdar
Dr Mohammad Taqi
Freya Dasgupta
G. Rajaraman
K.V. Bapa Rao
Maheshwer Peri
Namrata Joshi
News Ed
Omar Ali
Our Readers Write Back
Prarthna Gahilote
Shefalee Vasudev
Sundeep Dougal
recent comments


OUTLOOK TOPICS:    a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9   
Or just type in a few initial letters of a topic: